Continuation Vehicles: Don't wave the chequered flag too soon | Coller Capital
26 May 2026 Publication
Research & Insights

Continuation Vehicles: Don’t wave the chequered flag too soon

Quality remains the defining filter

A persistent misconception is that continuation vehicles are used to offload assets that failed to find buyers elsewhere. The market data does not support this. Anecdotally, only around 50% of single-asset transactions brought to market end up closing,1 reflecting genuine selectivity on the part of secondary investors. Assets that succeed are typically those already generating strong returns — around 3x — with a credible pathway to 2–3x further growth. Secondaries managers can afford to be selective about which assets they chose to invest in.

 


We just want to buy the GP's best asset. When a GP has sold their best asset to a competitor who made 5x, our proposition is: that 5x can be yours.
Black and white formal headshot of Martin Fleischer.
Martin Fleischer
Partner, Investment

What makes a strong continuation vehicle candidate?

The best assets share consistent characteristics: resilient cash flows, strong organic growth, and multiple value creation levers such as organic expansion, M&A, and margin improvement. GPs who approach the market having already tried and failed to sell an asset through a conventional process are quickly identified. The strongest transactions are those where a GP has tracked an asset as a likely compounder from year two or three of ownership — not those driven by DPI pressure alone.

View transcript

00:00:05 – 00:00:12
First off, it would be a quality asset, one that we and the GP believes will continue to compound.

00:00:12 – 00:00:22
I think the second thing that we look for is a good quality manager. It’s probably somebody we have a relationship with so that we understand the rationale of running this transaction.

00:00:22 – 00:00:28
But it has to be a good quality manager that that we would also feel confident could manage this asset.

00:00:28 – 00:00:32
Most importantly I think, is actually alignment; one of our non-negotiables.

00:00:32 – 00:00:38
We want to make sure the GP is a buyer of the asset, and so alignment is crucial for us.

00:00:38 – 00:00:44
And lastly, it’s if we believe we can come up with a fair valuation that works for both parties.

00:00:44 – 00:00:46
Those are probably the top four things that we look for.

References

1 Nigel Dawn, Evercore. (2026, April). “GP-Led Continuation Funds Panel”, Coller Capital LP Meeting.

Previous
Record volumes for CVs
Next
Diligence at scale