Private Equity Findings, Issue 20 | Coller Capital
25 July 2024 Publication
News & PR

Private Equity Findings, Issue 20

Topics
Foreword By the numbers
Retrospective: A bigger picture
Overview Understanding LPs performanceThe role of academic research in PEThe most influential pieces of academic researchThe affect of the 2006-07 credit bubble Resilience of the PE industryThe the growth of private debt fundsAreas of current researchAreas of research opportunities?
What’s at stake?
Roundtable: Will AI transform private equity?
Overview PE embracing AI technologiesAI origination for VC investmentsThe limitations of AI & lack of dataAI in decision makingUsing AI to predict future outcomesDo LPs really need AI to process qualitative information?AI techniques to predict company director performanceDo large networks and directorships mean poor performance?What aspects of PE are ripe for AI disruption?AI for PE: hype vs. reality
Time for a new model?
Overview Time for a new model: The research viewpointTime for a new model: The investor viewpoint
The side letter arms race
Understanding LPs performance
Foreword By the numbers
Retrospective: A bigger picture
Understanding LPs performance The role of academic research in PE The most influential pieces of academic research The affect of the 2006-07 credit bubble Resilience of the PE industry The the growth of private debt funds Areas of current research Areas of research opportunities?
What’s at stake?
Roundtable: Will AI transform private equity?
PE embracing AI technologies AI origination for VC investments The limitations of AI & lack of data AI in decision making Using AI to predict future outcomes Do LPs really need AI to process qualitative information? AI techniques to predict company director performance Do large networks and directorships mean poor performance? What aspects of PE are ripe for AI disruption? AI for PE: hype vs. reality
Time for a new model?
Time for a new model: The research viewpoint Time for a new model: The investor viewpoint
The side letter arms race
Retrospective: A bigger picture
Antoinette, in our earliest interview with you – in issue two – we talked about the findings of your research into LP performance. Further research has built on that over the years. So where are we today with understanding how LPs perform in PE?

“Our research from 2005 showed that the PE programmes of endowments and foundations performed better than those  of other LPs, often because of the resources they had. David Robinson built on that by finding that even within endowments and foundations, performance was heterogeneous. Josh and I then carried out research that showed that, as discretionary vehicles and feeder funds have proliferated, who you are as an LP has a big effect on your performance because that determines what GPs will offer you in these vehicles. One of the most striking findings was that LPs in the same fund had differing performance from the same GP and the same fund because of these new fund structures.”
Antoinette Schoar

Persistence of GP performance is another area where we have seen quite a lot of research. What do the results tell us today about how much LPs can rely on past performance?

“Our research from 2005 showed that the PE programmes of endowments and foundations performed better than those  of other LPs, often because of the resources they had. David Robinson built on that by finding that even within endowments and foundations, performance was heterogeneous. Josh and I then carried out research that showed that, as discretionary vehicles and feeder funds have proliferated, who you are as an LP has a big effect on your performance because that determines what GPs will offer you in these vehicles. One of the most striking findings was that LPs in the same fund had differing performance from the same GP and the same fund because of these new fund structures.”
Antoinette Schoar

“We still see performance persistence in VC, but we don’t see it in buyout funds at the time of fundraising. That makes it harder to predict the winners in buyout funds. I think some of this stems from the fact that companies selling to buyout firms are completely cashing out and so often take the highest bid in an auction. It’s harder to gain an advantage beyond that. However, in VC, the stakes companies sell to VC firms are much smaller, in the order of 20% rather than 100%. As a result, founders care more about the value the VC firm brings to their remaining shares. They may very well prefer a lower valuation from a well-known VC firm to a higher price from an investor with less of a reputation.”
Steven Kaplan

Want more information about this publication?
Get in touch
Previous
Retrospective: A bigger picture
Next
The role of academic research in PE